The “science to policy” pathway has received increasing attention in recent years, however there are still gaps in ensuring the process results in land use management outcomes on the ground. The two stages in the pathway (science then policy incorporation) are of equal importance and one is meaningless without the other. 

This case study focuses on the Ord river system, a modified, Ramsar listed wetland that provides a significant water supply for irrigated agriculture in the East Kimberley, WA. The limited science available for assessing environmental impacts of foreshore developments meant Natural Resource Managers were often providing generic setback advice which was not being well received by decision makers, developers and stakeholders. A foreshore Biophysical Criteria Assessment was completed to provide site specific scientific information. A cross agency collaborative process was then undertaken to ensure that science was imbedded well in the regulatory process overseeing local land use decisions within the foreshore area.

Each stage of the pathway required a very different set of skills, strategies and approaches. Recognition of these differences is critical for facilitating the effective uptake of science into policy. Here we have demonstrated that with effective cross agency collaboration, science can be implemented well in the decision making process at a level that will result in on ground outcomes for the protection of a significant waterway.