Struggling with stochasticity: metaphors, narratives and evidence (#2)
Rather than bore you
with my Greatest Decisive Datasets (I don’t have any) or my Most Influential
Policy Document (an oxymoron), I’m taking the opportunity to revisit the Big
Idea that excited me as a PhD student in the early 1980s: stochastic, ‘non-equilibrial’
ecosystems. Both lotic and lentic systems seem prime examples, but have we
developed appropriate ways of thinking about them – both scientifically and culturally?
In reviewing our progress, I will argue that we reach for metaphors rather more
than we’d like to think we do. While this can generate novelty, it can
constrain the narratives we spin and the types of evidence we pursue. I will
illustrate by focussing on resilience and regime shifts because they are
interesting ideas and have become prominent themes in our narratives about inland
waters. Gathering evidence about these can be problematic. So have the
metaphors that generated these ideas in the first place have outlived their usefulness?
I have no pat answers, but I hope to reinvigorate our engagement with big ideas
and stochastic systems, and I hope to reinvigorate some of you too.